Steig
Larsson’s Millennium trilogy is undoubtedly very popular his first book, The
Girl with the Dragon Tattoo (originally entitled Women Who Hate Men), sold over
65 million copies and around 9 million people have seen the Swedish thriller,
so an opportunity for an American production company to pointlessly remake the
film is an opportunity not to be missed.
After failing to win a case against businessman Hans-Erik Wennerström disgraced journalist Mikael Blomkvist must pay 600,000 Swedish Krona (about 87,000 USD) in damages, his career in journalism is under threat. However, he is contacted by Dirch Frode (Steven Berkoff) who informs Mikael that Henrik Vanger (Christopher Plummer) is in need of him to solve the mystery of his missing (Vanger believes killed) niece. After Mikael finds out that background checks were done upon him before he was hired for the role (the hacker gained access to private records), Mikael wishes to meet this computer hacker, Lisbeth Salander (Rooney Mara), and asks her to be his research partner (blackmails her to be his research partner).
Quite a
few foreign films get the American remake, the most recent major Swedish movie
to be remade for American audiences was Let the Right One In, and more common than
not the original was by far the superior film, so people looked on the English
language remake (or re-adaptation) of The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo with
trepidation but with David Fincher signed on the film did have some promise.
Fincher and his screenwriter Steven Zaillian are rather loyal to the source
material (diverting occasionally from the source material to change parts of
the story) creating a tense, excellently executed thriller of rape, lies and
murder. The book contains many dark themes, and Fincher’s film emulates them
exactly with the violent images on screen and Jeff Cronenweth’s cinematography
captures the gloomy, sparse and snowy landscapes of Northern Sweden expertly.
The story itself is tense, brilliantly executed and gripping, a very powerful
and graphic tale, and one in which Fincher shows in its full grisly detail, not
hiding away from the book's controversial themes.
Fincher’s
film is smartly written and directed with aplomb also the film is edited with
style but the superb performances from the whole cast involved (despite some of
the shaky Swedish accents) really do heighten proceedings considerably. The
best performance comes from Rooney Mara (who shot to fame with her memorable
cameo role in The Social Network) who plays Lisbeth Salander, branded psychotic
by the state; Lisbeth has had a violent past, a past that creates the
person who she is today. Salander is a complex individual with negative
feelings, maybe even hateful feelings, towards men (especially towards men who
abuse women) as she has a history of being abused by them. Mara’s performance
is an imposing, engaging and fascinating one. Daniel Craig is satisfactory
as Mikael Blomkvist but he, rather generously, allows Mara to steal the
limelight; Craig’s performance is strong and rugged but lacking somewhat in the
emotional department. The supporting cast also did a cracking job; Christopher
Plummer is impressive and Stellan Skarsgard is as magnificent as ever, but some
roles are rather underwritten. The credits sequence can be seen (as one
Radiotimes reviewer has noted) as a gothic James Bond, the soundtrack that
accompanies it is exciting. It’s just a shame that it isn’t Led Zeppelin but a
cover version, however it still sounds terrific.
Now we
get onto some of the issues, the American remake (or re-adaptation) is tense,
brilliantly acted, well written, edited majestically and manages to (mostly)
justify the running time but the Swedish version is also tense, brilliantly
acted, well written and edited majestically but better paced as, in Fincher’s
film, the involvement of a business deal between Wagner’s company and
Millennium (the magazine which Blomkvist used to work for), and Blomkvist’s
relationship with his co-worker, though it may be loyal to the source material,
slowed down proceedings and just isn’t interesting enough. So the American
remake does what the Swedish original does but the Swedish original does
everything better (with the exception of the editing and possibly the
direction). Fincher’s The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo makes some plot changes
but these plot changes are not necessarily for the better, also Fincher drags
the ending out needlessly. So Fincher’s remake (re-adaptation) is not by any
means a scene by scene remake but I still fail to see the point of it as the
Swedish version is the superior version and already fits the bill perfectly as
an adaptation of Larsson’s book.
Fincher’s
The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo is a visually brilliant, breathless and bleak
film that features a dominating, Oscar nomination worthy performance by Rooney
Mara. It is edgy, riveting, and the harrowing visuals may prove too much for
some. Yet the film is mostly well paced, with a few scenes and an ending that
drags out proceedings but overall the American version of The Girl with the
Dragon Tattoo is efficient filmmaking, however Se7en, The Social Network,
Zodiac and maybe Fight Club are all better works of Fincher’s filmography.
The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo is good but why not just watch the
superior Swedish version?
4/5
I remember the trailer for this being overly loud and action packed which really sealed the film as being a idiotic blockbuster. but I guess I am wrong. I will check this out when it is on DVD. Great review!
ReplyDeleteIf your interested, I am running a writing competition with 9 days to go on it. Write about your favourite director, actor or film for the chance to win a prize.
http://filmmasterjournal.blogspot.com/2011/12/100k-writers-competition.html
I did feel the ending was dragged out a bit, but I preferred Finchers version to the Swedish version. Good review though
ReplyDeleteI'm American, but I prefer the Swedish version of the film. I felt the remake suffered from the same things the book did (i.e. the ending, the motivations of charactes, the weakening of the Salander character at the end, etc.) The original film fixed most of the book's weaknesses, whereas the remake was more faithful.
ReplyDelete