Spartacus came about
because Kirk Douglas got a tad stroppy at the fact he lost the leading role in the
1959 epic Benhur to Charlton Heston. Spartacus was designed to be just as
epic as the 1959 Best Picture winner, and thus when original director Antony
Mann was sacked because he did not meet Douglas’ epic vision Douglas hired
Stanley Kubrick to replace Mann in directorial duties. At this time it is clear
that Douglas’ ego was as big and epic as the film itself.
Spartacus is one
of thousands of slaves working under the rule of the Roman Empire; these slaves
are worked to death in many places across the Empire. In Spartacus’ case he is
mining in the scorching heat of the Libyan Desert. When a fellow slave collapses
due to exhaustion and the sweltering heat Spartacus rushes to his aid, but is whipped
for doing so, in retaliation Spartacus bites the Roman’s ankles and as a result
is sentenced to death via starvation. However his life is saved as barely a few
hours later a slave trader/Ianista, named Lentulus Batiatus (Peter Ustinov),
arrives on the scene looking to purchase a slave in a bid to train him up as a
gladiator. Lentulus spots Spartacus, and admiring his strength and size Lentulus
buys him bringing Spartacus to a gladiator training school.
Here Spartacus
is shocked and disgusted at the way the rich and spoilt casually pick slaves to
fight each other to the death, quietly hiding his rage he feels against society
Spartacus is trained into becoming a powerful fighter. While at the gladiator
training school Spartacus falls in love with Varinia (Jean Simmons), but when
she is sold to Marcus Licinius Crassus (Lawrence Oliver), a Paritcian of Rome,
his anger at the system reaches breaking point and he leads the slave
revolution against the Roman Empire. Meanwhile the side story is a political
one, Marcus Licunius Crassus wishes to turn Rome into a dictatorship, and
naturally Gracchus (Charles Laughton), a
republican, opposes this.
Out of all the
Kubrick films that are considered to be masterpieces Spartacus is probably the least ‘Kubrickian’ film of them all. This is true for a number of reasons, firstly
he had a cast he did not hire; a script he did not approve and sets he did help
design. However despite the fact that
Kubrick did make some changes and added his own little touches Spartacus doesn’t feel like a Kubrick
film, however it is a testament to his abilities that Kubrick, who hitherto
never directed anything quite as huge, could take the reins of a massive
production and direct something like Spartacus,
a historical epic that rivals the likes of Lawrence
of Arabia and Benhur. Even more
impressively Kubrick and blacklisted screenwriter Dalton Trumbo never let the film’s
sheer size dwarf over the characters as the viewer is truly behind Spartacus’
cause. The performances by the actors involved make the characters just as
memorable as the sensational set designs.
With a budget of
$12,000,000 it is hardly surprising that the set designs are as elaborate as
they are. There is something more epic seeing incredibly designed Hollywood sets
back in the days in which the likes of Benhur
and Cleopatra were being produced
than it is in films like Avatar, Star Wars (the prequels) and Gladiator because the likes of Avatar, Star Wars and Gladiator employ
the use of GCI. I’m not against GCI (if used correctly) but using incredible
set designs and 8,500 extras for a battle sequence feels more like proper, adventurous
and epic filmmaking. I mean look at the image below, what a sight that is. 8500
extras in formation preparing for battle, it’s a simply a spectacular view.
There are
numerous versions of Spartacus; the
most recent restoration was in 1991 which included the homosexual undertones between
Crassus and Antoninus (Tony Curtis), and a
further fourteen extra minutes which brought the total running time up to 196
minutes. However this may appear an inflated and bloated running time, but Spartacus never gets boring for a great
number of reasons ranging from the incredible performances, brilliant battle
sequences and the magnificent set designs. All the performances are terrific
but it’s the British who steal the show from the Americans, Best Supporting Actor
winner Peter Ustinov steals every scene he is
in, Lawrence Oliver is superb and Jean Simmons is more
than satisfactory, though her love affair with Spartacus is when the film’s is
a tad slouchy. Kirk Douglas is fine in the central role of Spartacus whose
heroic cause to end slavery looks set to continue after his death, the film
doesn’t feel the need to end in an obligatory happy ending which is usually
expected for epics of this size.
Like many films Spartacus can be used to perhaps analyse
American history during the time period in which the film was made. Slavery
plays a major theme in the film, and during the 60s the Civil Rights Movement
was in full swing, black people were fighting to end racial segregation while,
in the film, slaves were fighting for their freedom and also against their own
segregation and exploitation from the upper classes. Yet the film also points
out the fact that America, like the Roman Empire, was built on the enslavement,
buying and selling of thousands of people. Impressively though the film never loses track
of its central themes as it also comments upon American’s political situation
at the time the film was made.
It is true that some
the props are a tad dated but Spartacus is truly a sweeping, sumptuous and
soaring epic that influenced the swords and sandal genre to this very day
(similarities with Ridley Scott’s Gladiator
are clear for all to see). It may not be the most popular Stanley Kubrick film,
it may not even be ‘Kubrick’ film, but it certainly is a superb one. It never
feels as long and bloated as one expects it to be, but instead is thoroughly
enjoyable Hollywood epic whose themes are very closely related to American history during the late 50s and early 1960s.
4.5/5.
Many people are fans of Kubrick's later movies, but for my money this is the best film he made. It works at all levels. I agree on the scenes with all the extras marching. They are quite impressive for the sheer scale of them.
ReplyDeleteThanks for mentioning Gladiator. Whenever I point out that it is a remake of just one part of Spartacus the most common response I get is "what's a spartacus?"
The uninformed mind of a non cinephile. Having seen both Gladiator and Spartacus I can't see how anyone can write a review of Gladiator without mentioning Spartacus and vice versa.
Delete