Might be some plot spoilers. People's opinions on plot spoilers differs.
Ridley Scott’s second feature
film Alien still remains, after
thirty years, one of the greatest horror/science fiction movies ever made, it
is the essential haunted house story in which there is no escape from the
monster lurking about the tight, claustrophobic hallways. Thirty years on Alien was followed by three sequels, two
spin off series (Predator and Alien vs. Predator) and finally Prometheus which Scott claims is not a
prequel, but the film is still set in the Aliens
franchise’s universe.
In the distant past an advanced
humanoid (looking a bit like a well built Lord Voldemort) lands on Earth,
consumes some dark liquid and disintegrates. Several thousand years later (in
2089) a team of scientists discover a cave containing a drawing which connects
several ancient civilizations (Mayas, Egyptians and Babylonians etc) despite
the fact they never communicated with oneanother. The archaeologist couple who discovers
the cave painting are Elizabeth Shaw (Noomi Rapace) and Charlie Holloway (Logan
Marshall Green) who are then hired by the Weyland Corporation to
travel aboard the ship Prometheus to the distant moon LV-223
as the constellation the moon is part of matches the map the cave painting seems to
be displaying. Upon arriving on the moon of LV-223 the crew of
seventeen finds a huge caving system and a head of an alien that died many
thousands of years ago. The explorers recover the head and naturally, as it is
humans exploring in space, from there on things start to get drastically worse.
Ridley Scott is not best known as
an actors’ director but more of a visual director with the ability to create immense landscapes as he did in the likes of Blade Runner, Gladiator and Kingdom of Heaven. Prometheus
is another great example of Ridley Scott’s talents in creating an outstanding
visual spectacle. Shot on location in
Iceland and the Isle of Sky (in Scotland) Scott and his cinematographer Dariusz
Wolski transforms Earth’s very own landscapes into believable alien worlds
(with the help of GCI) as the landscapes in the scenes shot in Iceland are years
upon years of untouched Earth surroundings which successfully gave off a
prehistoric image of the world. The interior of the alien world and set designs
are also mightily impressive as Scott creates a film that is visually
magnificent, however Prometheus is
let down in other areas.
One of the reasons why the
tension in Alien worked so well was
because of the fact that the characters felt like real characters as they were
all fleshed out individuals. This however is not the case with Prometheus as the characters that Scott
and screenwriters (Damon Lindelof and Jon Spaihts) draw are woeful characterisations.
There are around seventeen members of the
crew and much of them not developed beyond clichés (the hard-nosed, no bullshit
corporate leader, bad ass captain and nerdy scientist) while the secondary
characters seem to have been completely forgotten about. The god devoted
central character, Elizabeth, is one of the two characters who are even remotely
interesting. Such the extent of the poorly written characters is that the most
interesting characterisation is that of the robot David (Michael Fassbender). If the most interesting character is a robot then we have a problem as
we are about as emotionally invested in the characters as David is.
Noomi Rapace and Michael
Fassbender (whose performance is modelled on T.E Lawrence) are excellent in
their respective roles. Rapace convincingly portrays her many different
emotions of anger, desperation and grief while Fassbender makes a credible, emotionless
android. The supporting cast do their job in playing their less than
interesting characters, but they hampered by some terrible dialogue and a
script that swings from interesting to downright silly and frustrating.
Characters come and go, sometimes we don’t even know of their passing,
sometimes we even forget they existed as the seventeen or so crew members
become far too much for Scott to develop into real, fleshed out individuals of
whom we care about. However, Scott
manages to draw some tension as a viewer becomes fascinated by the alien world,
but however these moments work well because the link to Alien becomes apparent as we are aware of what may be lurking in
the darkness and it becomes a terrifying thought.
The themes that Scott’s film
discusses are ones that have discussed many times before, namely the dangers of
human space exploration, faith and where the human race originated from. Prometheus examines the creationist
versus Darwinian debate discussing whether we were created or evolved. This
philosophy never comes across as greatly interesting as the two minds who wrote
the script seemed to be coming at the production in different directions. One
writer wanted an interesting film that debates the meaning of humanity while
attempting to puzzle out where we are from, however the other half seems
content on adding as many lame one-liners as possible.
Ridley Scott’s Prometheus isn’t a terrible film by any
stretch of the imagination, but it is undoubtedly a disappointment due to the high
degree of anticipation of which a Science Fiction film had not received since Star Wars Episode I. For every good
moment there is a frustrating one just around the corner as Scott’s film is
badly let down by shoddy writing and dire characterisations. Prometheus is never boring but it could
have been so much better.
3/5.
The promotion for this film made it look freakin’ awesome but also, a lot like Alien and I think that’s the big problem with the film. It’s pretty much the same formula used over again and even though Scott tries his hardest to get our heads past that, it’s too obvious, too quick. Good review Myerla.
ReplyDeleteI agree with much of what you wrote and I gave it the same rating.
ReplyDeleteInteresting you highlight the problems with the characters. Heard a lot of people complaining about the story and the unanswered questions but less dealing with this aspect. Great review. I'd probably give it 3.5.
ReplyDeleteThe thing about unanswered questions is that it allows the viewer to debate it among others. It makes people think about the film long after its finished.
ReplyDelete