Hasbro (the company behind the Transformers
franchise) have felt it to be a good idea to base a film on a board game called
Battleship. Now, you must be thinking
‘hang on, there were no aliens in the game battleship’
and you will be correct in thinking such a thing, but the link between the film
and board game is somewhat tenuous. It is clearly a Hasbro film as Battleship
looks exactly like Transformers, but
on sea and even worse (though granted I have not tortured myself watching the
second and third films of the Transformers
franchise).
In 2005, NASA discovered a
planet, in a galaxy far, far away, that has similar conditions to those on
Earth – in other words, it can harbour life. Good old NASA sent a signal to
communicate with this planet, hoping to receive some message proving that there
is life out there. Meanwhile, slacker Alex Hopper (Taylor Kitcsh) does pretty
much F-all with his life and he is forced to join the navy by his brother
(played by Alexander Skarsgård). While sailing the seas the message NASA sent
six years previously is answered and the planet is under extraterrestrial threat.
America (with some help from the Japanese) must protect the seemingly naval
lacking world from extinction.
It is not often that a film is
compared unfavourably to Michael Bay’s Transformers
franchise, but Battleship is one of
those films that makes the Transformers
franchise seem like a work of art. What is perhaps most irritating is that
despite spending more than $200,000,000 on the film (most of it on special effects)
the film looks incredibly ugly. It is not that the GCI looks overly fake, but
it is the clumsy editing and cinematography that makes Battleship horrible to look at, completely wasting the $200,000,000
spent on making things explode.
Peter Berg, whose last feature
film, that he directed, was Hancock
(which I actually quite like), seems to be made redundant as soon as the
explosions take centre stage as there is no story, no interesting characters.
The second and most of the third act (it takes about forty minutes before the
aliens spring into action) are big, deafening and boring as explosion after
explosion takes place. Apparently, this is called ‘escapist entertainment’, but
it’s a rather loose use of the word ‘entertainment’ as a colossal number of
explosions will never be enough to make an entertaining film (which I have to
say at over two hours in length, you do feel every single minute).
You know what, these films can
work, take Independence Day for
example, but what films like Battleship
need is a main character with charisma (which Independence Day had in the shape of Will Smith). Taylor Kitcsh is
completely lacking in the charisma that is needed to make the audience engage
and warm to his character. Kitcsh gives his second bland performance in the year 2012 as his performance as John Carter was equally as bad, if not
worse, than his performance in Battleship.
He is supported by Alexander Skarsgård (can’t be the son of Stellan Skarsgård)
and Rihanna who isn’t the film’s biggest problem as the script, the performance
of lead man and the fact the film is terribly dull are far more pressing
issues. What is perhaps most confusing and ridiculous is the instant change in
the personality of the main character. Drivel. The film almost sunk at the Box
Office.
1/5
I swear to god, the only reason this movie was made was based on a bet.
ReplyDeleteI heard that the loser had a choice, Hungry, Hungry hippos or Battleship.
DeleteThis movie just annoyed the hell out of me by how loud and dumb it was. And even though it provided me a lot of action to be enjoyed by, the writing was just so terrible that it couldn't keep me happy for long. Good review Myerla.
ReplyDeleteHow generous, I gave it a 0. Good review nonetheless.
ReplyDeleteThis is one of those films I feel strangely tempted by. Just to see how bad it is. On the other hand, I might just take your review as gospel and give it a miss.
ReplyDelete