Based
on the video game franchise, the film starts in the year 1492 where a
group of secret assassins swear to protect the Prince of Grenada.
These are the Assassin’s Brotherhood who have long opposed the
Templar Order. Hundreds of years later Callum Lynch (Michael
Fassbender) is executed for murder, but he wakes up inside the
compound of a mysterious company who have traced his heritage and
found out he’s related to one of the Assassins. They have built a
machine that allows Callum to inhabit the memories of his ancestor
and tasked him with finding the Apple of Eden.
These
days the best video games have their own rich story line and
interesting characters that they are, in their own way, cinematic. So
much so that video games really don’t need the movie treatment
anymore. That, of course, doesn’t stop studios churning out poor
movie adaptions of video games and Assassin’s Creed
continues that trend (it says a lot when the best video game
adaptation of the year is Angry Birds). I’m not an
avid player of the Assassin Creed franchise (I’ve
played the second game) but the main issue I have is that the games
were rated for mature players, the film, however, is rated 12A. The
12A rating isn’t the curx of the issue, however, it’s the fact
that the camera cuts away at the slightest notion of violence meaning
that the action sequences and choppily edited. This is done so that
film gets that 12A rating.
The
film’s narrative is best described as confusing, the overall story
itself (which seems to lack understanding of pacing) is easy enough
to understand but the general plot poses a lot of “but why were”
or “why would” type questions because the flimsy narrative leaves
gaping holes. The film takes a number of narrative missteps with the
decision to spend the majority of time in the Animus world being the
biggest misstep of all. The Animus was essentially the boring parts
of the game so it’s befuddling that the film would wish to spend so
much time there. The best parts of the Assassin Creed
video games was the exploration of the worlds the developers created,
jumping from building to building, and killing enemies in the most
ingenious way possible. There’s very little of that in the film and
what there is of it is clouded by dust, further obscuring what can be
seen the film’s frantically edited action scenes.
There
soaring shots that follows the bird in middle age Spain is perhaps
the only really impressive thing in a film that wastes the talents of
the stars involved. It would be a disappointment if video game
adaptions weren’t constantly disappointing.
1/5
It seems studios never get video game movies right. At best, some are just "okay" you never hear anyone calling them "fantastic."
ReplyDeleteI've never played the games myself, so I'll probably skip this one unless it ends up on HBO or something.
Yeah. I just think they don't actually understand what people like about them.
DeleteWill they ever get videogame movies right? I'll still be seeing this in a few days though because of Michael Fassbender.
ReplyDelete