In-between the release dates of
The Avengers: Infinity War and Antman and the Wasp, Marvel was hit by a small
scandal which ended up in James Gunn losing his job. Granted James Gunn has been borderline
insufferable on Twitter, but we are left with no doubt that this attack (started
by a right-wing scumbag named Mike Cernovich) was simply done to attack someone
on the different side of the political spectrum. However, the left is just as
guilty of similar. It just seems that too many people just don't like hearing things they dont like.
Despite losing Edgar Wright as
director for the first film, the first film was a surprising success. It’s more of
the same for the sequel as Hank (Michael Douglas), Hope (Evangeline Lilly) and
Scott (Paul Rudd) try to rescue Hanks’ wife, Janet (Michelle Pfeiffer), from
the quantum zone. Meanwhile, an unknown enemy, named Ghost (Hannah John-Kamen), wants to harvest
power from the quantum zone, an action that will kill Janet.
The sequel to Ant Man is fun
enough, even though it feels as though it’s the most standalone of the recent
Marvel films. That, in a sense, means it’s nothing more than a mildness, enjoyable
distraction that is powered along by engaging and committed performances. The
film's formula works, even if the formula is become more and more formulic and it
is because the Marvel films often feature good performances from good actors that the Marvel train is still on full stream ahead.
The film has a villain with
understandable motives, but a predictable character arc. The whole thing would
have been a damned sight easier if Ghost just kinda asked for help rather than
fighting for it and because of that the film is longer than is required. It is
the weakest written entry of the series so far, because the story simply
focuses on various mishaps, missteps and misdirections around the same plot
point for almost two hours. Essentially for two hours, Hank, Hope and Scott’s
plans to get Julia out of the quantum zone are frequently scuppered, mostly by Ghost.
The film makes most of its best
hand with clever use of its main gimmick (namely the changing size of everyday
objects) is a way that constantly entertaining. It’s a fun film even though it
may have worked being a subplot in the previous Avengers film (but may have
lacked some emotional pull if it did).
3.5/5
3.5/5
I liked this. It's not my favorite Marvel flick but I enjoyed it a bit more than the first Ant-Man.
ReplyDeleteYeah. I enjoyed it also.
DeleteGood blog post. I liked the movie, mainly because Paul Rudd was so funny and the action/fight scenes with everything and everyone changing size was really well done and funny also.
ReplyDeleteI think that's the reason I like a lot of Marvel movies, the peformers are so good they carry even the weaker films.
DeleteThat's pretty much how I felt about it: weak writing, good action. Great point about the film's length and the reason for it. It does keep circling around the same thing forever. Great review!
ReplyDeleteThanks.
Delete