Into the Woods is a screen adaptation of the musical, of the same
name, by Stephen Sondheim and James Lapine and, like the musical, the film
tries to combine many of the characters from the collection of fairy tales
gathered by the Brothers Grimm such as Cinderella, Little Red Riding Hood, Rapunzel
and Jack (as in Jack the beanstalk). This fantasy, cross over mish mash works
reasonably well but the focus on many different characters, and attempts to
devote equal screen time to them, damages the film's pacing.
Revolutionary France's only
cockney is back, and now he's being a cockney in some made up, generic fantasy land
filled with all types of the fairy tale creatures and characters. I jest of
course as I take nothing away from Daniel Huttlestone (who has done a lot of
growing of late) who I feel is rather talented as his cheeky and cocky
performance captured his character well in Les Misérables. In Into the Woods, Huttlestone's
performance is once again entirely watchable.
As are much much of the cast,
Anna Kendrick, who has been in a lot of musicals of late (Pitch Perfect 1 and 2
for example), is pretty good and James Corden and Emily Blunt are excellent
together but it's Meryl Streep's Oscar nominated performance that steals the
show. Streep is undoubtedly one of the finest actors of any generation, but it
seems the she get a nomination for whatever reason the academy deem fit. She
could read the phone book and still be nominated. However, it's unfair to
chastise Streep or the Academy for this as Streep's performance as the evil
Witch is rather fun to watch.
So the performances by the likes
of Streep and Kendrick are inherently watchable, but the musical numbers are a
tad forgettable. Rob Marshall, who directed the 2002 Oscar Winning Musical Chicago, doesn't make the musical
sequences visually impressive (though, visually, there is one good musical
piece later on in the film) and the songs themselves just aren't distinctly
memorable. Rest assured parents it's not like you'll have the kids singing any
of these songs nonstop like they did with Let It Go because the songs aren't as
catchy as they should be.
The set designs are terrific and
costumes excellent but as someone who is not partial to a musical and neither
do I outright reject them Into The Woods didn't win me over because of the lack
of memorable and catchy songs (though there are some good songs) which more
often than not are rather irritating (yeah, we get it...you've got to the
bloody festival. Please stop going on about it). Is it because the songs lack
memorable lyrics or Marshall's staging of the songs isn't visually arresting?
Personally, I'd go for the latter as Stephen Sondheim's stage musical seems
hugely popular.
2.5/5
I tried watching this, but the singing got on my nerves extremely quickly so I decided to stop watching...
ReplyDeleteHaha. I almost did the same, the first song (which seemed to go on forever) was annoying to listen to.
DeleteNo, I think it was the directing (since it's the same setting over and over) instead of the songs. Also, no memorable lyrics at all? Not even "Woods are just trees, trees are just wood"?
ReplyDeleteActually, after re listening to some of the songs, I found myself liking them rather more. They seem to be growing on me. I feel my first impression is unfair.
Delete