Angelina Jolie's second
directorial effort is based on the book by Laura Hillenbrand which detailed the
trials and tribulations of Louis Zamperini, an American soldier who endured
detainment in a series of Japanese POW camps after surviving 47 days adrift at
sea as a result of a plane crash in the Pacific Ocean.
Many people seem rather
dismissive of Angelina Jolie, maybe it is because of her marriage to Brad Pitt
or because she has a filmography that can be described as 'not great'. However, her move into directing
films that have waded into complex and controversial issues deserves some acknowledgement. For example, The Land of
Blood and Honey (which I haven't actually seen because it never got a UK
release - not a good sign) attempts to give women a voice in war. The critical reception was decidedly mixed, but to
make a film on a first outing about a complex
and controversial war is a brave move by Jolie.
Jolie's next effort is once again
set during a time of war, it's a decent effort but it is a film that is very
conventional in its depiction of a POW camp in Japan. References to films such
as The Bridge over the River Kwai are
quite clear (though the actors in David Lean's film were considerably well fed
compared to those in Unbroken). Another
film that this reminded me of was the British effort The Railway Man which was a superior film as it examined post war
events and reconciliation.
Jolie certainly creates a film
that on occasions is quite powerful but, on occasions, it feels conventional
and heavily handed (particularly when it deals with religious aspects of the
story)and whilst the central character, Louis Zamperini, isn't the deepest it would be wrong to say he
doesn't cut an engaging and sympathetic figure. His determination and
resilience is quite inspiring and Jack
O'Connell's (a rising star to cherish) performance is a magnificent one as he
brilliantly anchors the film by displaying Zamperini's immense strength and sheer
force of will.
There are some set pieces are
worthy of praise as both Jolie and cinematographer Roger Deakins (whose work is
outstanding yet again) do an excellent job at making film's opening dogfight gripping,
and the plane crash itself (with the sea looming menacingly for miles and
miles) is equally intense as the dogfight. Yet the film feels slightly
episodic, the flashback scenes where Louis is a young child are engaging and the
scenes where the crashed pilots survive out at sea effectively illuminate the
daunting situation they find themselves in.
However, it's when Louis becomes
a POW the movie loses its way a little and becomes a conventional Pacific POW
film (admittedly it still makes for brutal viewing) and the film's Christ like
metaphors become heavy handed. However, Unbroken
still a film that has something within itself to be a moving and powerful experience.
3/5
Good review. I agree about it not being very good, but I thought it was better than THE RAILWAY MAN.
ReplyDeleteI really dug The Railway Man, the post war scenes added an element of depth for me.
DeleteI felt the same, that it got a bad rep from critics and while not a great movie, it wasn't as bad as they said. Do they hold Jolie to a higher standard, or are they dismissive because of her gender?
ReplyDeleteI certainly think her gender plays a role in why some maybe dismissive of her, but I do feel people are as equally dismissive of the likes of James Franco.
Delete