In the closing week of May 1940
the British Expeditionary Force (BEF) and many thousands of allied soldiers were
left standard on the beaches of Dunkirk entirely surrounded by the German Army.
Facing a highly organised and efficient army and bombs dropping from the air,
the Allied troops waited for rescue. Dunkirk
is the telling of Operation Dynamo, which led to the rescue of over 300,000 Allied
troops.
In 1998 Saving Private Ryan was released in US cinemas, and it brought about
numerous articles about how the sheer realism of the film transported veterans
back to the beaches of Normandy and Omaha. Articles similar in nature followed
the release of Dunkirk, and this goes
to show historical films are about experiencing
history rather than simply telling it. The main goal of a historical film is
not total historical accuracy but allow the viewer to experience history and
understand the human aspect of it. Films like Dunkirk are exemplary in doing exactly that.
Dunkirk depicts the experience of the evacuation as intense, brutal
and harrowing without ever resorting to gore as shock value. What instead
becomes the film’s shock value is the sound design. The monstrous bellowing roar
of the German planes descending from the sky, preparing to attack the stranded
men below, and the booming explosions of dropped bombs rattle the senses. It’s
a visceral, enthralling, utterly captivating experience with Hans Zimmer’s
score, which sometimes sounds like a ticking clock (alluding to the race against
time scenario the BEF found themselves in), adding to the often unbearable tension.
Christopher Nolan’s war film isn’t
a standard war film as it is stripped down of the usual clichés. It’s a stripped-down
film that feels wrong to call stripped-down, but gone is any backstory that
would help give context to Dunkirk’s importance in the war. Also gone is any soldier
camaraderie and remising about home, and whilst this may sound like character
is lost amongst the explosions and dogfights this certainly isn’t the case.
Much of the character development is done with actions rather than words with
Cillian Murphy’s character clearly showing signs he is wrestling with his
guilty conscience for his cowardice.
To distance itself from being a
typical war film Nolan took the interesting step of having three narratives
(land, sea and air) eventually intertwine, yet each story is told over a
different period of time (one week, one day, one hour) and they all converge at
the same time. This clever way of telling the story adds further tension to the
film as certain scenes would lack the same level of tension if the film
followed a standard liner narrative. It’s a risky move and whilst it doesn’t
feel like a whole week has passed for those on the land, overall it’s an
effective story telling technique.
The acting is perfectly fine, but
the film belongs to Nolan (who does take one or two risks with the minimal
dialogue and narrative style) and his crew. Hoyte van Hoytema’s cinematography
throws the viewer in midst of the intensity of the explosions (with the
drowning sequence in particular being the most distressing) and whilst some of
the dialogue lacks clarity, Dunkirk
is a stunning, technically sound telling of a miraculous evacuation in which
over 300,000 soldiers were saved to fight another day (the true scale of the
evacuation is lost somewhat). Dunkirk
is a powerful, deeply emotional and involving film.
4.5/5
I liked that this was so different from other war movies as you said. I enjoyed it too.
ReplyDeleteAre you gonna see Avengers: Infinity War?
DeleteI think it is a linking issue. Thanks for letting me know
ReplyDelete