Shortly after Sofia Coppola’
success at the Cannes Film Festival (where she won best director) her latest
effort was the target of criticism for the removal of a black slave character
from the story (the character featured in both the 1971 original and the novel).
Sofia’s defence was that she didn’t wish to half arse such a serious topic (slavery) and thus focused on the isolation white Southern women felt during
the years of the American Civil War. It does seem questionable that a black
character would be excluded entirely from a picture set during a war where slavery was the main reason for
the fighting, but Coppola’s view of the novel does not deal with that aspect of
the war.
In East Virginia, a small group of teachers and students take in a injured Army soldier (Colin Farrell) however his arrival arrouses something within all the women who begin to start pitting themselves aganist each other vying for the soldier's attention.
I know little of the novel and
original Don Siegel 1971 film but many reviews mention that Coppola’s dream
like version has decided to tell the story of a man entering the repressed
world of a group of women from the female perspective. The isolation and
loneliness these women felt stems from being cut off from the world and in
denial of this changing world. They are suddenly left to fend for themselves as the
slaves and men have left, the latter of whom have gone to fight in a war which can be eerily heard in
the distance.
Each of the three main female
characters are different (the rest have personalities too but given less to do)
with Nicole Kidman’s frosty Martha, Kirsten Dunst’s Edwina Morrow, who gives off
an air of melancholic loneliness, with a yearning to escape and be desired, and
Elle Fanning’s more flirtatious and sexually aware Alice making up the three leading ladies. Whatever the
personality, Colin Farrell’s John McBurney is able to manipulate them and their vanities
and pit them against each other.
The ability which McBurney has to
say the right things, and pit these women against each other is deeply malevolent.
He has this perfect ability to charm his way into getting these women to open
up (even the cold Martha) and reveal their inner secrets. He also seems to have
an unnerving ability so say the right thing, he’s an undoubtedly charming
character, but there is a dangerous malevolence to the character's charm that prays
upon lonely and repressed women, manipulating them to his intent.
Philippe Le
Sourd's old-fashioned frame (1.66 ratio on 35mm stock) and tight camerawork empathises the claustrophobic conditions inside the house, however frequent exterior shots of the traditional southern architecture adds
to a slight feeling of repetitiveness (an odd problem for such a short film). Despite this, Sofia Coppola excels wonderfully, opening up the characters and
generating a lot of tension in one the most seat squirming dinner times in
recent memory.
4/5
4/5
I'm so looking forward to it. The repetitiveness thing is a problem with I think all of her movies - they are very subtle and beautifully shot but sometimes a bit slow and often times focusing on very similar shots
ReplyDeleteYeah. I think Somewhere had a similar issue.
Delete