In the third film of the Taken franchise, Bryan Mills (Liam
Neeson) is framed for the murder of his wife. He must evade capture, bring the
real killer to justice and clear his own name.
The first Taken film was released back in 2008, the film was exciting,
popular and really rather violent. Now, it's none of these things (well except
perhaps popular) because Taken 3 was
given a 12A rating (PG-13 for those in America) and thus the film lacks someone
getting their face smashed in with a fire extinguisher. In all seriousness
there is a legitimate point here and that is the toning down of horror films
and older movie franchises, such as The
Terminator franchise, for a PG-13 audience can be detrimental to the quality
of the film.
The reason why studios tone down
films is obvious, studios do so to increase the audience size, get more bums on
seats and get more money. In the case of Taken
3 the result is a film that has no sting, no bite and no excitement.
There's not a cracked skull, splatter of blood or broken bone to be found in Taken 3 (we do have waterboarding though), instead we get weak action and
film that is a perfect example of how not to make an action movie.
Oliver Megatron's direction of
the action scenes is nothing short of dreadful. The action scenes are edited at
a speed that it makes light look slow in comparison. The lightening quick
editing is so utterly incomprehensible that it's impossible to tell what's
going on and it's edited at such a fast speed it could probably give those
prone to motion sickness actual motion sickness (so you could say that people
were taken ill). I jest of course, but the editing is such a poor standard that
it's almost impossible to work out what's happening. Even the scenes where
there is no action are edited in a way that is just completely unnecessary.
It's probably because of the
absurd editing that the film is so toothless in its violence, you can't see any
of the violence or any of the punches that are swung or kicks that are lashed
out as the film panders to the demands of a PG-13 film. However, the film is
peppered with occasional moments of tension and Liam Neeson's performance as Bryan
Mills is suitably gruff but the story is so predictable even I figured out who
did what whom.
1.5/5
I gave it the same rating, yet, I thought it was the best of the franchise. By the way, I think the editing style you talked about has to do with Neeson's age.
ReplyDeleteI dunno...Liam Neeson seems pretty fit for a 60+year old. I know other action films Neeson in aren't quite a choppily edited as this
Delete