Grindelwald (Johnny Depp) is
being transported from America to Europe to face prosecution for his crimes on
European soil. Unsurprisingly, he escapes, and builds an army of followers to
help him create a wizarding world of entirely pure-blooded wizards. Dumbledore
(Jude Law) enlists the help of Newt (Eddie Redmanye) to help move against the
dark wizard.
Five films are planned in the Fantastic Beasts arm of the franchise. This does create a few problems
because the second part of series doesn’t really feel like a complete film as
it makes very little headway in the story. Instead, the film moves the pieces into
place for the climax in about three movies time. For casual or non-fans of the
franchise this is going to create problems because a large part of the movie is
dedicated to giving the character’s their own backstories. The fans may perhaps
like it, but a causal fan isn’t going to care too much about old Harry Potter
yore.
However, as someone who has read
the books, watched the films, listened to the audio books, and played (some) of
the video games (I have not seen the stage play) I did enjoy the film for the
reason it provided some backstory to a well-loved character. Jude Law plays
Dumbledore exceptionally well, getting the charisma and twinkle in his eye but
even the blindest Potter fan can see that multiple movies of very little
progress will only be a hindrance to the series.
Many of the issues above are
directly related to J.K Rowling’s script. As great of a world builder she is,
the film spends far too much time developing backstory and thus being
needlessly convoluted. Somehow the film manages, simultaneously, to be convoluted
and complex yet make little progress. This is mostly because of the multiple
plot stands the film has from Credence’s search for his parents, the various
relationships (Queenie and Jacob, Tina and Newt, Leta and Newt, Dumbledore and
Newt, Dumbledore and Grindelwald), Newt’s beef with the ministry, Dumbledore’s
beef with the ministry, Grindelwald’s quest for the followers. It’s too much
for one movie.
There are positives to Rowling’s
screenplay and these are mostly found when the story is making steps forward in
the narrative. The film’s themes of racial purity, comparative to events in Nazi
Germany (bear in mind the time the film is set), are interesting and timely
(and not dissimilar to Rowling’s previous thematic material in the Potter world).
The film even starts in the darkest possible manner with the murder of an
entire muggle Parisian family, but that does not set a stall for a film with an
ever-changing tone.
The performances are committed,
Eddie Redmayne radiates charm and likeability as the awkward Newt, Dan Folger
brings comic relief to the role as the fish out of water muggle in the
wizarding world and Zoe Kraviz is the best of the newcomers. Katherine Waterson
and Allison Sudol are given too little to do and Ezra Miller is the weakest of
the lot simply because I can’t see what he’s trying to do. Is he playing social
awkward? Mysterious and sociopathic? Moody and brooding? I don’t know. The
character is an emotional centrepiece, an orphan like Harry Potter, so it feels
Ezra’s bland and emotionless portrayal is a waste of great potential. Depp
makes for a good villain, but the franchise need to ditch some of its
flabbiness.
3/5
I still haven't watched this yet after reading all the spoilers. It's weird not rushing out to see a HP film for me. That's a shame Ezra was the worst bit for you, I love that guy.
ReplyDeleteIm most likely alone in not liking Ezra Miller
Delete