Dario Argento’s Suspiria is a gory classic with the most
incredible colour palettes to ever grace a horror film. It’s brisk running time,
corny script and iconic score only adds to the film’s everlasting legacy. So,
when it was announced that the 1977 classic would be remade there were murmurings
of discontent among horror aficionados who wondered if anything sacred was safe
from the evils of a remake? Then Luca Guadagnino announced himself as director
and, following the success of A Bigger
Splash and Call Me By Your Name, people were curious.
You can call the
2018 film a remake but in truth the film’s similarities start and end at the
characters and basic plot, therefore making it an entirely different beast.
Clocking in at 155 minutes the film is almost an entire hour longer than the
1977 original and it does suffer from its bloated running time. The film’s
bloated running time is in part due to the pollical subtext. The film is set in
1977 (the year the original was released) and deals with themes of national
guilt in a divided Berlin (the dance school is situated right next to the
Berlin Wall).
This is all
sounds very interesting, and does create an interesting back drop, but it
doesn’t really say anything new about the era. The film hints that blame should
be laid at those in power rather than those who witnessed what happened but did
nothing. This is hardly a new way of thinking, so it ends up being rather
pointless and unnecessarily distraction from the tense story of witches
harvesting young dancers for consumption by the mother witch.
What is also is
a major drawback with the national guilt theme is that it’s incredibly
distracting watching the film with the knowledge that Dr. Josef Klemperer is
Tilda Swinton dressed up in old man prosthetics. It’s distracting because it
feels like a superficial piece of stunt casting. Swinton said this was “only a
little bit of fun“ but this “little bit of fun” was nothing more than a vanity
project that completely derailed a potentially interesting subplot. This all is
just because I couldn’t take Tilda Swinton parading around in poor prosthetics
equipped with a heavy German accent seriously. On the plus side, Swinton is
superb as Madame Blanc and Dakota Johnson’s performance has tremendous
physicality (her dancing showed great dedication to the role), but the slow
delivery of her lines becomes grating.
What’s most
different about the 1977 Suspiria and
the 2018 Suspiria is that the latter
isn’t a horror in the same way the 1977 film is, but the 2018 film still mostly
fails on the basics of the genre. The film’s length hampers the tension because
the film’s bagginess does not allow the tension to be sustained throughout.
That said, there are a few scenes that are deeply horrifying, most notably the
dancing sequence where a spell is cast upon Susie which contorts a fellow
dancer’s body to mirror Susie’s dance moves. Criminally, despite all the
weirdness on show and a climax that resembles something from the movie Climax, the film forgets to be scary but
maybe it was trying to be (in the traditional sense at least).
Despite being
long, baggy and bizarrely paced the film isn’t boring, visually it’s too well
made and enticing to be boring. It’s certainly luxurious and beautifully made
(even if the colour palette is the opposite of the 1977 original). The dance
scenes are edited with an intoxicating excitement, almost as though a spell is
cast upon you. The makeup effects are beautifully disgusting and the film
appealingly gory, but the film is too long and too baggy to sustain the
tension.
3/5
The dance scenes in this film were great but I really didn't like this as much as I wanted to. I 100% agree with you in regards to the stunt casting. It was distracting.
ReplyDelete